Re: mmap vs fs cache

[Chris Friesen]

On 03/08/2013 03:40 AM, Howard Chu wrote:

> There is no way that a process that is accessing only 30GB of a mmap
> should be able to fill up 32GB of RAM. There's nothing else running on
> the machine, I've killed or suspended everything else in userland
> besides a couple shells running top and vmstat. When I manually
> drop_caches repeatedly, then eventually slapd RSS/SHR grows to 30GB and
> the physical I/O stops.

Is it possible that the kernel is doing some sort of automatic 
readahead, but it ends up reading pages corresponding to data that isn't 
ever queried and so doesn't get mapped by the application?

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/