Re: 3.6.11: khubd issue SLAB related?
From: Udo van den Heuvel
Date: Fri Mar 08 2013 - 08:15:34 EST
On 2013-03-08 14:11, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found this in dmesg:
slabtop:
Active / Total Objects (% used) : 784982 / 981439 (80.0%)
Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 62996 / 63077 (99.9%)
Active / Total Caches (% used) : 119 / 196 (60.7%)
Active / Total Size (% used) : 205966.20K / 236692.16K (87.0%)
Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.02K / 0.24K / 4096.00K
OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME
217946 211509 97% 0.06K 3694 59 14776K size-64
158508 65908 41% 0.10K 4284 37 17136K buffer_head
121380 107155 88% 0.12K 4046 30 16184K size-128
110692 108707 98% 0.86K 27673 4 110692K ext4_inode_cache
98980 85163 86% 0.19K 4949 20 19796K dentry
37927 32219 84% 0.16K 1649 23 6596K vm_area_struct
36001 24087 66% 0.55K 5143 7 20572K radix_tree_node
25179 19801 78% 0.05K 327 77 1308K anon_vma_chain
22561 7716 34% 0.05K 293 77 1172K jbd2_inode
17696 12708 71% 0.03K 158 112 632K size-32
17260 11348 65% 0.19K 863 20 3452K size-192
13416 8703 64% 0.29K 1032 13 4128K nf_conntrack_ffffffff815d8840
12274 12046 98% 0.11K 361 34 1444K sysfs_dir_cache
11977 10117 84% 0.06K 203 59 812K anon_vma
11070 9712 87% 0.25K 738 15 2952K filp
10638 10457 98% 0.60K 1773 6 7092K proc_inode_cache
9156 9136 99% 0.13K 327 28 1308K ext4_groupinfo_4k
3762 3161 84% 0.60K 627 6 2508K shmem_inode_cache
3744 3553 94% 0.02K 26 144 104K dm_target_io
3680 3553 96% 0.04K 40 92 160K dm_io
3577 2991 83% 0.54K 511 7 2044K inode_cache
3524 3103 88% 1.00K 881 4 3524K size-1024
2756 2586 93% 0.07K 52 53 208K Acpi-Operand
2044 1929 94% 0.13K 73 28 292K inotify_inode_mark
1600 1439 89% 0.50K 200 8 800K size-512
1380 552 40% 0.19K 69 20 276K cred_jar
1092 910 83% 0.62K 182 6 728K sock_inode_cache
1029 979 95% 0.53K 147 7 588K idr_layer_cache
1020 537 52% 0.19K 51 20 204K bio-0
1012 953 94% 0.04K 11 92 44K Acpi-Namespace
860 839 97% 0.19K 43 20 172K ip_dst_cache
810 605 74% 0.12K 27 30 108K pid
808 303 37% 0.02K 4 202 16K ext4_io_page
788 775 98% 2.00K 394 2 1576K size-2048
782 585 74% 0.11K 23 34 92K task_delay_info
765 474 61% 0.25K 51 15 204K skbuff_head_cache
742 209 28% 0.07K 14 53 56K eventpoll_pwq
693 640 92% 0.81K 77 9 616K UNIX
605 591 97% 1.56K 121 5 968K task_struct
560 119 21% 0.03K 5 112 20K tcp_bind_bucket
500 209 41% 0.19K 25 20 100K eventpoll_epi
486 418 86% 0.81K 54 9 432K task_xstate
480 378 78% 0.25K 32 15 128K size-256
480 241 50% 0.19K 24 20 96K inet_peer_cache
408 189 46% 0.11K 12 34 48K jbd2_journal_head
400 299 74% 0.15K 16 25 64K dm_crypt_io
369 308 83% 4.00K 369 1 1476K biovec-256
368 304 82% 1.00K 92 4 368K signal_cache
360 220 61% 0.09K 9 40 36K blkdev_ioc
354 354 100% 4.00K 354 1 1416K size-4096
354 149 42% 0.06K 6 59 24K fs_cache
350 230 65% 0.50K 50 7 200K skbuff_fclone_cache
303 296 97% 2.06K 101 3 808K sighand_cache
289 284 98% 16.00K 289 1 4624K size-16384
285 228 80% 0.25K 19 15 76K mnt_cache
276 50 18% 0.04K 3 92 12K khugepaged_mm_slot
270 224 82% 0.12K 9 30 36K scsi_sense_cache
255 183 71% 0.25K 17 15 68K sgpool-8
99.9% used?
Please help!
Udo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/