Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDUsubframe fails

From: Stanislaw Gruszka
Date: Mon Jan 07 2013 - 14:21:31 EST


On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:38:35PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:04:01PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> >> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:10 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:05:32AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >>>>>> To be clear, I have all of these in the queue:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> be03d4a45c09 rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails
> >>>>>> 5b632fe85ec8 mac80211: introduce IEEE80211_HW_TEARDOWN_AGGR_ON_BAR_FAIL
> >>>>>> ab9d6e4ffe19 Revert: "rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and I'm intending to drop/defer them all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Patch 3 is a revert of patch 1 (questioned patch). Please apply all 3 patches,
> >>>>> or only patch 2.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, actually all 3 patches have to be applied. Because last one, except
> >>>> revert, include flag IEEE80211_HW_TEARDOWN_AGGR_ON_BAR_FAIL setting in rt2x00
> >>>> driver, which make patch 2 work.
> >>>
> >>> Andreas said that that after ab9d6e4ffe19 there was still a regression.
> >
> > That's not true. There will be no regression after ab9d6e4ffe20. The
> > only thing is that solution is not perfect. But perfect solution require
> > lot of changes i.e. is not -stable appropriate (and does not exist currently).
> >
> >>> But maybe he was confused. I know I'm confused.
> >> :-))
> >>
> >> No, the thing is:
> >> rt2800pci misses an appropriate handling of aggregation (which meets the
> >> requirements of mac80211).
> >>
> >> Both workarounds, mine and the new workaround from Stanislaw (which is
> >> nothing more than a restricted version of my initial workaround), work
> >
> > Your workaround broke STA mode on some environment.
>
> Why are you sure, that this workaround doesn't break some other devices
> running in AP mode? We believed at that time too, it wouldn't harm even
> STA. But this was wrong for some (which?) devices.

Because it make behaviour the same as it was before 3.2, which introduce
those issues.

Stanislaw

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/