Re: ppoll() stuck on POLLIN while TCP peer is sending

[Eric Wong]

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 20:47 +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > [1] my full setup is very strange.
> > > 
> > >     Other than the FUSE component I forgot to mention, little depends on
> > >     the kernel.  With all this, the standalone toosleepy can get stuck.
> > >     I'll try to reproduce it with less...
> > 
> > I just confirmed my toosleepy processes will get stuck while just
> > doing "rsync -a" between local disks.  So this does not depend on
> > sendfile or FUSE to reproduce.
> > --
> 
> How do you tell your 'toosleepy' is stuck ?

My original post showed it stuck with strace (in ppoll + send).
I only strace after seeing it's not using any CPU in top.

http://mid.gmane.org/20121228014503.GA5017@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
(lsof also confirmed the ppoll/send sockets were peers)

> If reading its output, you should change its logic, there is no
> guarantee the recv() will deliver exactly 16384 bytes each round.
> 
> With the following patch, I cant reproduce the 'apparent stuck'

Right, the output is just an approximation and the logic there
was bogus.

Thanks for looking at this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/