Re: [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpc32xx - Fix the PWM polarity

From: Roland Stigge
Date: Fri Nov 23 2012 - 04:52:59 EST


On 11/23/2012 10:34 AM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Alban Bedel
> <alban.bedel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The duty cycles value goes from 1 (99% HIGH) to 256 (0% HIGH) but it
>> is stored modulo 256 in the register as it is only 8 bits wide.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@xxxxxxxxx>

When the below doc typos are fixed,

Acked-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@xxxxxxxxx>

>
>> ---
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> index adb87f0..03ec3ff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>> @@ -49,9 +49,24 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> c = 0; /* 0 set division by 256 */
>> period_cycles = c;
>>
>> + /* The duty value is a follow:
>> + *
>> + * DUTY HIGH LEVEL
>> + * 1 99.9%
>> + * 25 90.0%
>> + * 128 50.0%
>> + * 220 10.0%
>> + * 255 0.1%
>> + * 0 0.0%
>> + *
>> + * In other word the in-register value is duty % 256 with duty
>> + * in the range 1-256.
>> + */
>> c = 256 * duty_ns;
>> do_div(c, period_ns);
>> - duty_cycles = c;
>> + if (c > 255)
>> + c = 255;
>> + duty_cycles = 256 - c;
>>
>> writel(PWM_ENABLE | PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles),
>> lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2));
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/