[ 042/171] netfilter: Mark SYN/ACK packets as invalid from original direction

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Nov 22 2012 - 16:23:42 EST


3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 64f509ce71b08d037998e93dd51180c19b2f464c upstream.

Clients should not send such packets. By accepting them, we open
up a hole by wich ephemeral ports can be discovered in an off-path
attack.

See: "Reflection scan: an Off-Path Attack on TCP" by Jan Wrobel,
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.2074

Signed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
@@ -158,21 +158,18 @@ static const u8 tcp_conntracks[2][6][TCP
* sCL -> sSS
*/
/* sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2 */
-/*synack*/ { sIV, sIV, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sSR },
+/*synack*/ { sIV, sIV, sSR, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sSR },
/*
* sNO -> sIV Too late and no reason to do anything
* sSS -> sIV Client can't send SYN and then SYN/ACK
* sS2 -> sSR SYN/ACK sent to SYN2 in simultaneous open
- * sSR -> sIG
- * sES -> sIG Error: SYNs in window outside the SYN_SENT state
- * are errors. Receiver will reply with RST
- * and close the connection.
- * Or we are not in sync and hold a dead connection.
- * sFW -> sIG
- * sCW -> sIG
- * sLA -> sIG
- * sTW -> sIG
- * sCL -> sIG
+ * sSR -> sSR Late retransmitted SYN/ACK in simultaneous open
+ * sES -> sIV Invalid SYN/ACK packets sent by the client
+ * sFW -> sIV
+ * sCW -> sIV
+ * sLA -> sIV
+ * sTW -> sIV
+ * sCL -> sIV
*/
/* sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2 */
/*fin*/ { sIV, sIV, sFW, sFW, sLA, sLA, sLA, sTW, sCL, sIV },


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/