[ 160/171] libceph: recheck con state after allocating incoming message

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu Nov 22 2012 - 13:34:34 EST


3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx>

(cherry picked from commit 6139919133377652992a5fe134e22abce3e9c25e)

We drop the lock when calling the ->alloc_msg() con op, which means
we need to (a) not clobber con->in_msg without the mutex held, and (b)
we need to verify that we are still in the OPEN state when we retake
it to avoid causing any mayhem. If the state does change, -EAGAIN
will get us back to con_work() and loop.

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ceph/messenger.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -2735,9 +2735,16 @@ static int ceph_con_in_msg_alloc(struct
BUG_ON(con->in_msg != NULL);

if (con->ops->alloc_msg) {
+ struct ceph_msg *msg;
+
mutex_unlock(&con->mutex);
- con->in_msg = con->ops->alloc_msg(con, hdr, skip);
+ msg = con->ops->alloc_msg(con, hdr, skip);
mutex_lock(&con->mutex);
+ if (con->state != CON_STATE_OPEN) {
+ ceph_msg_put(msg);
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
+ con->in_msg = msg;
if (con->in_msg) {
con->in_msg->con = con->ops->get(con);
BUG_ON(con->in_msg->con == NULL);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/