Re: [PATCH] [firmware_class] Fix compile with no builtin firmware

[Solomon Peachy]

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:35:28AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Solomon, I can't duplicate the build failure with your .config on 3.7-rc5-next.

Okay, so it's since been fixed.  

> >  * The #ifdef wraps code that pertains solely to built-in firmware, (ie 
> >    CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL) and has an #else path for when it's disabled.
> >  * There is no point in a CONFIG_FW_LOADER test inside firmware_class.c 
> >    when the file isn't even compiled unless CONFIG_FW_LOADER is defined.
> 
> Enabling CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE still can make one firmware built in kernel
> even though CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL isn't defined, so your patch will break
> this case.

So... isn't the logical solution here to make CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMARE 
depend on (or enable) CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL?  After all, the two are 
apparently related.

I can update my patch to include this, and rewrite the commit message so 
it's relevant to modern kernels, or I can just drop this and forget the 
whole affair.

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy        		       pizza at shaftnet dot org	 
Melbourne, FL                          ^^ (mail/jabber/gtalk) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature