Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: Add Texas Instruments ADC081C021/027 support

[Thierry Reding]

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:04:33AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 10:50 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:33:48AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >> On 11/19/2012 09:21 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>> Add support for reading conversion results from the ADC and provide them
> >>> through a single IIO channel. A proper scaling factor is also exported
> >>> based on the reference voltage provided by a regulator.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >> [...]
> >>> +static int adc081c_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio,
> >>> +			    struct iio_chan_spec const *channel, int *value,
> >>> +			    int *micro, long mask)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	struct adc081c *adc = iio_priv(iio);
> >>> +	int err, scale;
> >>> +
> >>> +	switch (mask) {
> >>> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> >>> +		err = i2c_smbus_read_word_swapped(adc->i2c, REG_CONV_RES);
> >>> +		if (err < 0)
> >>> +			return err;
> >>> +
> >>> +		*value = (err >> 4) & 0xff;
> >>> +		return IIO_VAL_INT;
> >>> +
> >>> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> >>> +		err = regulator_get_voltage(adc->ref);
> >>> +		if (err < 0)
> >>> +			return err;
> >>> +
> >>> +		scale = err / 255;
> >>
> >> Shouldn't this be 256?
> > 
> > Well, the maximum value that the conversion register can contain is 255,
> > so if we divide by 256 we'll always be slightly off, right? Or maybe I
> > misunderstand what the scale factor is supposed to do. From reading the
> > documentation it seems like user-space is supposed to multiply the raw
> > value by the scale to obtain the real voltage.
> 
> So usually for ADCs the scale is from 0V to VREF - 1 lsb or VREF - 0.5 LSB.
> I just had a look at the adc081c927 datasheet and it looks as if it is no
> exception.
> 
> > 
> >>> +
> >>> +		*value = scale / 1000000;
> >>> +		*micro = scale % 1000000;
> >>
> >> scale for voltages is in microvolt, so I think it this is off by a factor of
> >> 1000.
> > 
> > If scale is supposed to be in microvolts, then this is off by a factor
> > of 1000000 since regulator_get_voltage() returns the voltage in
> > microvolts as well.
> 
> sorry, I meant millivolts, too early in the morning ;)

Okay, so both of your arguments indicate that I should indeed go for
what you proposed below.

> >> For ADCs it often makes sense to use IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2 with the val
> >> being set to the reference voltage (in mV) and val2 being set to the number
> >> of bits.
> >>
> >> E.g in your case
> >>
> >> 		*val = err / 1000;
> >> 		*val2 = 8;

I'll update the patch, thanks for reviewing.

Thierry

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature