Re: sigaltstack fun

[David Miller]

From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:10:13 +0000

> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:18:33PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:02:53 +0000
>> 
>> > Are you OK with the patch below?  Should be the minimal fix, getting
>> > rid of those segfaults and converting to usual semantics here...
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Yep, looks fine:
>> 
>> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Er...  So which tree should that go through?  sparc or signal?  There's
> a similar microblaze patch and a few more of the "do_sigaltstack() takes
> userland pointer" variety, so I can put together a pile in
> signal.git#for-linus, but if you prefer that to go through sparc tree,
> I'm fine with that...

I'm happy to take it via my sparc tree, and I'll queue it up for
-stable as well. Can you resend it to me with a proper commit message?

Thanks a lot Al.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/