Re: [Patch v1 1/1] RTL8712 alignment bug in 3.6.5 on ARM

From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Sun Nov 18 2012 - 13:30:48 EST


> >> diff -ruN a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_sta_mgt.c
> >> b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_sta_mgt.c
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_sta_mgt.c 2012-11-05
> >> 03:57:06.000000000 -0500
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_sta_mgt.c 2012-11-13
> >> 12:54:28.000000000 -0500
> >> @@ -55,8 +55,8 @@
> >> NUM_STA + 4);
> >> if (pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf == NULL)
> >> return _FAIL;
> >> - pstapriv->pstainfo_buf = pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf + 4 -
> >> - ((addr_t)(pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf) & 3);
> >> + pstapriv->pstainfo_buf = pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf + 8 -
> >> + ((addr_t)(pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf) & 7);
> >
> > Are you sure this is safe? Is the allocated buffer large enough for
> > those additional 4 bytes of alignment you're adding?
>
> I'm not certain on that, I bumped the allocations at Andrew's
> suggestion, but don't know enough to certify the changes as 100%
> correct.

Its not correct.

The original code is:

pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf = _malloc(sizeof(struct sta_info) *
NUM_STA + 4);
if (pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf == NULL)
return _FAIL;
pstapriv->pstainfo_buf = pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf + 4 -
((addr_t)(pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf) & 3);

The 4 in the _malloc() also needs increasing to 8.

Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/