Re: Benchmark results: "Enhanced NUMA scheduling with adaptiveaffinity"

[Andrea Arcangeli]

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:14:28PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> With some shuffling the question on what to consider for merging
> becomes
> 
>
> 1. TLB optimisation patches 1-3?	 	Patches  1-3

I assume you mean simply reshuffling 33-35 as 1-3.

> 2. Stats for migration?				Patches  4-6
> 3. Common NUMA infrastructure?			Patches  7-21
> 4. Basic fault-driven policy, stats, ratelimits	Patches 22-35
> 
> Patches 36-43 are complete cabbage and should not be considered at this
> stage. It should be possible to build the placement policies and the
> scheduling decisions from schednuma, autonuma, some combination of the
> above or something completely different on top of patches 1-35.
> 
> Peter, Ingo, Andrea?

The patches 1-35 looks a great foundation so I think they'd be an
ideal candidate for a first upstream inclusion.

Thanks,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/