Re: [PATCH 1/6] dmaengine: introduce is_slave_xfer function

From: Mika Westerberg
Date: Fri Nov 16 2012 - 10:29:11 EST


On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:26:07PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > I wonder if the above function need some prefix like
> > dmaengine_is_slave_xfer()?
>
> is_dma_slave_xfer seems more consistent with other helper functions.
>
> But is_slave_xfer is vacant anyway. I like shorter names.

Fair enough.

Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/