Re: [PATCH 00/31] Latest numa/core patches, v15

From: Mel Gorman
Date: Wed Nov 14 2012 - 07:03:28 EST


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:52:22AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:13:23PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is the latest iteration of our numa/core tree, which
> > > implements adaptive NUMA affinity balancing.
> > >
> > > Changes in this version:
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/315
> > >
> > > Performance figures:
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/330
> > >
> > > Any review feedback, comments and test results are welcome!
> > >
> >
> > For the purposes of review and testing, this is going to be
> > hard to pick apart and compare. It doesn't apply against
> > 3.7-rc5 [...]
>
> Because the scheduler changes are highly non-trivial it's on top
> of the scheduler tree:
>
> git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
>
> I just tested the patches, they all apply cleanly, with zero
> fuzz and offsets.
>

My apologies about the merge complaint. I used the wrong baseline and
the problem was on my side. The series does indeed apply cleanly once
the scheduler patches are pulled in too.

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/