Re: [RFC PATCH 00/31] Foundation for automatic NUMA balancing V2

[Rik van Riel]

On 11/13/2012 12:27 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > I'd also like to add another, structural side note: you
> > > mixed new vm-stats bits into the whole queue, needlessly
> > > blowing up the size and the mm/ specific portions of the
> > > tree. I'd suggest to post and keep those bits separately,
> > > preferably on top of what we have already once it has
> > > settled down. I'm keeping the 'perf bench numa' bits
> > > separate as well.
> >
> > The stats part are fairly late in the queue. I noticed they
> > break build for !CONFIG_BALANCE_NUMA but it was trivially
> > resolved. [...]
>
> Ok - the vm-stats bits are the last larger item remaining that
> I've seen - could you please redo any of your changes on top of
> the latest tip:numa/core tree, to make them easier for me to
> pick up?
>
> Your tree is slowly becoming a rebase of tip:numa/core and that
> will certainly cause problems.

Mel's tree looks like the easiest of the two to merge
from an mm/ point of view.

> I'll backmerge any delta patches and rebase as necessary - but
> please do them as deltas on top of tip:numa/core to make things
> reviewable and easier to merge:
>
>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git numa/core
>
> Thanks!
>
> 	Ingo


--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/