Re: Does anyone use CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU?

From: Nick Bowler
Date: Tue Nov 13 2012 - 17:41:23 EST


On 2012-11-13 14:25 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:47:20PM -0500, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > On 2012-11-13 13:19 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:56:54PM -0500, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > > > On 2012-11-13 09:08 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > Suppose that TREE_PREEMPT_RCU was available for !SMP && PREEMPT builds.
> > > > > Would that work for you?
> > > >
> > > > To be honest I don't really know what the difference is, other than what
> > > > the help text says, which is:
> > > >
> > > > [TINY_PREEMPT_RCU] greatly reduces the memory footprint of RCU.
> > > >
> > > > "Greatly reduced memory footprint" sounds pretty useful...
> > >
> > > OK, so from your viewpoint, the only possible benefit is smaller
> > > memory?
> >
> > Well, I have no idea. If I was given the choice between TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
> > and TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, absent any information not in the description of
> > these options, I would choose TINY. The description suggests that the
> > memory savings come at the expense of SMP support, which sounds like a
> > great tradeoff to make for a UP system.
> >
> > > How much memory does your device have, if I may ask?
> >
> > It's a (pretty old!) desktop. I recently had to upgrade it to two
> > gigabytes due to unbearable thrashing with only one...
>
> If you have two gigabytes (or even one gigabyte), you won't notice the
> few kilobytes of difference between TINY_PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU.

Well then TINY_PREEMPT_RCU doesn't sound all that useful for me!
Perhaps the help text could be improved... such as changing the words
"greatly reduced" to "marginally reduced" as a first step?

Is there no significant cache impact due to the larger implementation?
I don't really have the time or expertise to do measurements in this
regard, but if TREE_PREEMPT_RCU was actually a selectable option I could
at least choose it to see if anything explodes horribly...

Cheers,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/