Re: [PATCH] Centralise CONFIG_ARCH_NO_VIRT_TO_BUS

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue Nov 13 2012 - 05:32:30 EST


On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 366ec06..9bc00e7 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -271,6 +271,13 @@ config ARCH_WANT_OLD_COMPAT_IPC
> select ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
> bool
>
> +config ARCH_NO_VIRT_TO_BUS
> + bool
> + help
> + An architecture should select this if it cannot (or will not)
> + implement virt_to_bus(). All new architectures should probably
> + select this.

Don't we typically put the burden of selecting Kconfig flags for deprecated
features on the existing architectures that provide the deprecated features?

I.e. shouldn't it be ARCH_HAS_VIRT_TO_BUS, selected by the architectures
that need it, instead?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/