Re: [PATCH] alpha: use BUG_ON where possible

[Jiri Kosina]

On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Sasha Levin wrote:

> >> Just use BUG_ON() instead of constructions such as:
> >>
> >> 	if (...)
> >> 		BUG()
> >>
> >> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation
> >> is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >>
> >> // <smpl>
> >> @@
> >> expression e;
> >> @@
> >> - if (e) BUG();
> >> + BUG_ON(e);
> > 
> > Ok, I guess I am just going to apply this one. Thanks,
> > 
> 
> So I have about 80 more of these. I've sent out the first 10 to make sure
> that they look fine and the only complaints I got about them are that they are
> trivial :)
> 
> Can I send the rest directly to you to go through the trivial tree?

How many conflict can you see if you generate this patch on top of Linus' 
tree and thn apply it to linux-next?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/