Re: scsi target, likely GPL violation

[Alan Cox]

> >      1. Yes, I've got first hand proof of a GPL violation (in which case
> >         we'll then move to seeing how we can remedy this) or
> >      2. A genuine public apology for the libel, which I'll do my best to
> >         prevail on RTS to accept.
> > 
> > Because any further discussion of unsubstantiated allegations of this
> > nature exposes us all to jeopardy of legal sanction.
> 
> That asks for moderation until we have a better investigation of the
> facts.  It definitely doesn't try to prejudge them or express preference
> for a specific outcome as your misquote makes out.

So how can you demand a public apology for libel or instant first hand
proof and now claim you just wanted moderation ? It's not hard to see why
your position was misinterpreted ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/