Re: [GIT PULL] drbd-8.4.2 for the linux-3.8 merge window

[Jens Axboe]

On 2012-11-09 13:42, Philipp Reisner wrote:
> [...]
>>> It has the sysfs bits in again. The reason for that is that we want to
>>> expose more information by that, and remove the /proc/drbd with the
>>> next evolutionary step. -- In case this is a show stopper, let me
>>> remove the sysfs bits.
>>
>> The exact same sysfs bits I complained about last time? If yes, then I
>> don't understand why you haven't changed yet. Or why you are trying to
>> push the same bits again that got rejected last time.
>>
> 
> I had the impression it was rejected because I submitted the pull request
> too late to you. In the sense of, it might go in, if it gets submitted
> for inclusion before the merge window opens...
> Apparently my impression was wrong. You will get an updated pull-request 
> with the sysfs bits removed

It was late, but that was a different issue. I just re-read the Oct 3rd
emails on this, and I definitely did recommend that you looked at
debugfs or similar for this. We're not putting another top-queue level
directory in for a block device that is specific to drbd.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/