[RFC v2 2/2] procfs: /proc/sched_debug fails on very very large machines.

[Nathan Zimmer]

On systems with 4096 cores attemping to read /proc/sched_debug fails.
We are trying to push all the data into a single kmalloc buffer.
The issue is on these very large machines all the data will not fit in 4mb.

A better solution is to not us the single_open mechanism but to provide
our own seq_operations and treat each cpu as an individual record.

The output should be identical to previous version.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@xxxxxxx>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/debug.c |   73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 6f79596..d519cc7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -322,11 +322,10 @@ static const char *sched_tunable_scaling_names[] = {
 	"linear"
 };
 
-static int sched_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+static void sched_debug_header(struct seq_file *m)
 {
 	u64 ktime, sched_clk, cpu_clk;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	int cpu;
 
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	ktime = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
@@ -368,14 +367,22 @@ static int sched_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 #undef PN
 #undef P
 
-	SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-40s: %d (%s)\n", "sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling",
+	SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-40s: %d (%s)\n",
+		"sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling",
 		sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling,
 		sched_tunable_scaling_names[sysctl_sched_tunable_scaling]);
+}
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+static int sched_debug_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+{
+	int cpu = (unsigned long)(v - 2);
+	
+	if (cpu != -1 && cpu != nr_cpu_ids) 
 		print_cpu(m, cpu);
-
-	SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
+	else if (cpu == -1)
+		sched_debug_header(m);	
+	else
+		SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -385,16 +392,66 @@ void sysrq_sched_debug_show(void)
 	sched_debug_show(NULL, NULL);
 }
 
+static void *sched_debug_start(struct seq_file *file, loff_t *offset)
+{
+	unsigned long n = *offset;
+
+	if (n == 0)
+		return (void *) 1;
+
+	n--;
+
+	if (n > 0)
+		n = cpumask_next(n - 1, cpu_online_mask);
+	else
+		n = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
+
+	*offset = n + 1;
+
+	if (n <= nr_cpu_ids)
+		return (void *)(unsigned long)(n + 2);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *sched_debug_next(struct seq_file *file, void *data, loff_t *offset)
+{
+	(*offset)++;
+	return sched_debug_start(file, offset);
+}
+
+static void sched_debug_stop(struct seq_file *file, void *data)
+{
+}
+
+
+static const struct seq_operations sched_debug_sops = {
+	.start = sched_debug_start,
+	.next = sched_debug_next,
+	.stop = sched_debug_stop,
+	.show = sched_debug_show,
+};
+
+static int sched_debug_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	seq_release(inode, file);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int sched_debug_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
-	return single_open(filp, sched_debug_show, NULL);
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	ret = seq_open(filp, &sched_debug_sops);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct file_operations sched_debug_fops = {
 	.open		= sched_debug_open,
 	.read		= seq_read,
 	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
-	.release	= single_release,
+	.release	= sched_debug_release,
 };
 
 static int __init init_sched_debug_procfs(void)
-- 
1.6.0.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/