Re: [PATCH 13/19] mm: mempolicy: Use _PAGE_NUMA to migrate pages

From: Rik van Riel
Date: Tue Nov 06 2012 - 14:25:22 EST


On 11/06/2012 04:14 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
Note: Based on "mm/mpol: Use special PROT_NONE to migrate pages" but
sufficiently different that the signed-off-bys were dropped

Combine our previous _PAGE_NUMA, mpol_misplaced and migrate_misplaced_page()
pieces into an effective migrate on fault scheme.

Note that (on x86) we rely on PROT_NONE pages being !present and avoid
the TLB flush from try_to_unmap(TTU_MIGRATION). This greatly improves the
page-migration performance.

Based-on-work-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>


page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, pte);
BUG_ON(!page);
+
+ get_page(page);
+ current_nid = page_to_nid(page);
+ target_nid = mpol_misplaced(page, vma, addr);
+ if (target_nid == -1)
+ goto clear_pmdnuma;
+
+ pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+ migrate_misplaced_page(page, target_nid);
+ page = NULL;
+
+ ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
+ if (!pte_same(*ptep, pte))
+ goto out_unlock;
+

I see you tried to avoid the extraneous TLB flush
from inside migrate_misplaced_page. However,
try_to_unmap_one calls ptep_clear_flush, which will
currently still result in a remote TLB flush for
a _PAGE_NUMA pte, despite the pte not being
accessible for memory accesses (_PAGE_PRESENT not set).

Furthermore, if migrate_misplaced_page moved the page,
the !pte_same check will return false, and you will
get a double fault.

I wonder if migrate_misplaced_page should return a
struct page* or a pfn, so we can compute what "pte"
_should_ be, corrected for the new pfn, feed that
value to pte_same, and then avoid the double fault?

Also, we may want the change for ptep_clear_flush
that avoids flushing remote TLBs for a pte without
the _PAGE_PRESENT bit set.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/