Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:35:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:08:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > I thought we were trying to move away from explicit arch exclusions,
>> >> > but if S390 is special then fine with me. I've folded Heiko's fix into
>> >>
>> >> "depends on GENERIC_HARDIRQS" is the alternative...
>> >
>> > That would make even less sense to me, I2C can work just fine without
>> > IRQs.
>>
>> For the individual drivers that need it...
>
> Oh, of course. Sorry I was probably not completely awaken ;)

Me neither ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/