Re: [PATCH] UV: fix incorrect tlb flush all issue

[Ingo Molnar]

* Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx>
> 
> (this was sent as an ack on 9/13, but with incorrect title and sign-off)
> 
> Ack.
> But with the adjustment below.  The 'end' argument was not declared long.
> 
> I tested the patch on a UV.
> It has the effect of either clearing 1 or all TLBs in a cpu.
> I added some debugging to test for the cases when clearing all TLBs is
> overkill, and in practice it happens very seldom.
> 
> Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx>

If this is still substantially the original patch then I suspect 
this should be From: Alex Shi, and the small fix you made can be 
added as:

 Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
 [ fixed the 'end' argument to be declared 'long'. ]
 Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/