Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] fat (exportfs): rebuild inode if ilookup() fails

From: Namjae Jeon
Date: Mon Sep 24 2012 - 00:13:10 EST


2012/9/22, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> + if (inode == NULL && MSDOS_SB(sb)->options.nfs == FAT_NFS_LIMITED) {
>> + struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
>> + struct msdos_dir_entry *de ;
>> + loff_t i_pos = (loff_t)ino;
>> + int bits = MSDOS_SB(sb)->dir_per_block_bits;
>> + loff_t blocknr = i_pos >> bits;
>> + bh = sb_bread(sb, blocknr);
>> + if (!bh) {
>> + fat_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
>> + "unable to read block(%llu) for building NFS inode",
>> + (llu)blocknr);
>> + return inode;
>> + }
>> + de = (struct msdos_dir_entry *)bh->b_data;
>> + /* If a file is deleted on server and client is not updated
>> + * yet, we must not build the inode upon a lookup call.
>> + */
>> + if (de[i_pos&((1<<bits)-1)].name[0] == DELETED_FLAG)
>
> IS_FREE() would be better.
Okay~ I will change.
>
>> +
>> + inode = NULL;
>> + else
>> + inode = fat_build_inode(sb, &de[i_pos&((1<<bits)-1)],
>> + i_pos);
>> + brelse(bh);
>> + }
>>
>> return inode;
>> }
>
> 1 << bits == sbi->dir_per_block
>
> It would be better to add helper to decode i_pos to blocknr and offset.
> And it should be shared on fat_write_inode and this.
Okay, I will change.

Thanks.
> --
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/