[PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Fix obsolete rcu_initiate_boost() header comment

[Paul E. McKenney]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>

Commit 1217ed1b (rcu: permit rcu_read_unlock() to be called while holding
runqueue locks) made rcu_initiate_boost() restore irq state when releasing
the rcu_node structure's ->lock, but failed to update the header comment
accordingly.  This commit therefore brings the header comment up to date.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index c930a47..3ea60c9 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -1193,9 +1193,9 @@ static int rcu_boost_kthread(void *arg)
  * kthread to start boosting them.  If there is an expedited grace
  * period in progress, it is always time to boost.
  *
- * The caller must hold rnp->lock, which this function releases,
- * but irqs remain disabled.  The ->boost_kthread_task is immortal,
- * so we don't need to worry about it going away.
+ * The caller must hold rnp->lock, which this function releases.
+ * The ->boost_kthread_task is immortal, so we don't need to worry
+ * about it going away.
  */
 static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
 {
-- 
1.7.8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/