Re: [PATCH 04/22] ASoC: Ux500: Move MSP pinctrl setup into the MSP driver

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

>> But wait. These are just local statics. Surelty you can put these into
>> struct ux500_msp instead? Here it looks like these will be used for
>> all ports, so MSP2 will enable the pins requested by MSP1 etc
>> completely broken. So put it into the struct ux500_msp state
>> container from ux500_msp_i2s.h where it belongs.
>>
>> Refer to drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c when in trouble. This
>> one is a good pinctrl example.
>
> How do you see the MSP1 and MSP3 usage protection working if I hide it
> all away in MSP specific structs?

Usage protection? Sorry not following. Please elaborate...

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/