Re: [RFC 03/23] ARM: LPAE: use phys_addr_t on virt <--> phys conversion

From: Cyril Chemparathy
Date: Tue Jul 24 2012 - 06:55:34 EST


On 7/24/2012 6:37 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 02:09:05AM +0100, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
This patch fixes up the types used when converting back and forth between
physical and virtual addresses.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h | 17 +++++++++++------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
index fcb5757..7629dfe 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h
@@ -169,22 +169,27 @@ extern unsigned long __pv_phys_offset;
: "=r" (to) \
: "r" (from), "I" (type))

-static inline unsigned long __virt_to_phys(unsigned long x)
+static inline phys_addr_t __virt_to_phys(unsigned long x)
{
unsigned long t;
__pv_stub(x, t, "add", __PV_BITS_31_24);
return t;
}

-static inline unsigned long __phys_to_virt(unsigned long x)
+static inline unsigned long __phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
{
unsigned long t;
__pv_stub(x, t, "sub", __PV_BITS_31_24);
return t;
}

BTW, I would prefer if the phys-to-virt patching was fixed as well. It
shouldn't be difficult.


On that topic - yes, we have this on our radar, but in our case we;re talking about patching (in head.S) and then repatching (at switch over).

One of the ideas we've been bouncing around has been to convert the phys-virt patch code into arithmetic on PFNs. This way we don't have to get too messy with 64-bit in the patch code, and we can use the same patch code for both phys_to_virt and virt_to_phys. Thoughts on this approach?

--
Thanks
- Cyril
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/