Re: [RFC] Introduce to batch variants of accept() and epoll_ctl() syscall

[Andi Kleen]

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> I believe accept() is the problem here, because it contends with the
> softirq processing the tcp session handshake.

The MOSBENCH people some time ago did a per CPU accept queue. This is
probably overkill, but there are clearly some scaling problems here
with enough cores.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/