Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Don't assume the alternative cyclesencoding is architectural

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 07:23 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> But it's very clear this cannot be done without a model check.
> I don't understand how you can even argue against that. 

Who said I fixed it without a model check?

But simply disabling it for a model isn't how you do things. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/