Re: [PATCH] cpumask: add a few comments of cpumask functions

[Alex Shi]

On 05/30/2012 06:49 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 05/29/2012 09:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>>> s/return/Returns
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you mean by "old" cpumask?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for comments!
>>>>> Should be "the old bitmap of cpumask"?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, there is no "old" or "new" cpumask here because this function doesn't
>>>> change the cpumask. It just checks if that bit is set.
>>>> So something like:
>>>> Returns 1 if 'cpu' is set in 'cpumask', else returns 0.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, thanks! and comments changed again following your style.
>>> Is the following new update patch ok?
>>
>>
>> Any further comments for this patch? :)
> 
> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks!
Does someone like to pick up this patch? :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/