Re: Inconsistent load average on tickless kernels

From: Jonathan Nieder
Date: Mon Apr 23 2012 - 13:57:26 EST


LesÅaw KopeÄ wrote:

> 2.6.32.55-hz-0f004f5a69 9.88
> 2.6.32.55-no-hz-74f5187ac8 2.48
> 2.6.32.55-no-hz-c308b56b53 2.22
> 3.0.28-hz 10.66
> 3.0.28-no-hz 0.60
> 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53 4.09
> 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53 nohz=off 6.78
> 3.2.12-hz 10.16
> 3.2.12-no-hz 0.66
> 3.2.12-no-hz-c308b56b53 4.36
>
> What's worth noting is that I haven't seen any nasty side effects of the
> latest patch on all kernel versions that I've tested. Hope that helps.

Ok.

Peter, do you think it would make sense to add c308b56b53987 to 3.0.y
and newer stable kernels?

Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/