[PATCH 3/4] perf, x86: Check if user fp is valid

From: Arun Sharma
Date: Fri Apr 20 2012 - 18:53:04 EST


Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@xxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 13 +++++++------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index e054459..997d59b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -32,9 +32,9 @@

#define segment_eq(a, b) ((a).seg == (b).seg)

-#define __addr_ok(addr) \
- ((unsigned long __force)(addr) < \
- (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg))
+#define __cur_addr_limit (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
+#define __addr_ok(addr) \
+ ((unsigned long __force)(addr) < __cur_addr_limit)

/*
* Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address.
@@ -46,14 +46,14 @@
* This needs 33-bit (65-bit for x86_64) arithmetic. We have a carry...
*/

-#define __range_not_ok(addr, size) \
+#define __range_not_ok(addr, size, limit) \
({ \
unsigned long flag, roksum; \
__chk_user_ptr(addr); \
asm("add %3,%1 ; sbb %0,%0 ; cmp %1,%4 ; sbb $0,%0" \
: "=&r" (flag), "=r" (roksum) \
: "1" (addr), "g" ((long)(size)), \
- "rm" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)); \
+ "rm" (limit)); \
flag; \
})

@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@
* checks that the pointer is in the user space range - after calling
* this function, memory access functions may still return -EFAULT.
*/
-#define access_ok(type, addr, size) (likely(__range_not_ok(addr, size) == 0))
+#define access_ok(type, addr, size) \
+ (likely(__range_not_ok(addr, size, __cur_addr_limit) == 0))

/*
* The exception table consists of pairs of addresses: the first is the
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 9f98636..3e4be2c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1761,6 +1761,12 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
dump_trace(NULL, regs, NULL, 0, &backtrace_ops, entry);
}

+static inline int
+valid_user_frame(const void __user *fp, unsigned long size)
+{
+ return (__range_not_ok(fp, size, TASK_SIZE) == 0);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT

#include <asm/compat.h>
@@ -1785,6 +1791,9 @@ perf_callchain_user32(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_callchain_entry *entry)
if (bytes != sizeof(frame))
break;

+ if (!valid_user_frame(fp, sizeof(frame)))
+ break;
+
perf_callchain_store(entry, frame.return_address);
fp = compat_ptr(frame.next_frame);
}
@@ -1828,6 +1837,9 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry *entry, struct pt_regs *regs)
if (bytes != sizeof(frame))
break;

+ if (!valid_user_frame(fp, sizeof(frame)))
+ break;
+
perf_callchain_store(entry, frame.return_address);
fp = frame.next_frame;
}
--
1.7.8.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/