Re: [RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Fri Apr 20 2012 - 14:59:36 EST

On 04/20, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Yes, We install breakpoints unconditionally, I think we had already
> discussed this and Oleg had proposed a solution too.
> where we move the mm struct from task
> struct to signal struct.

Yes, this too.

Hmm. May be we can do something else? Currently uprobe_consumer->filter()
returns a boolean. Perhaps it can return "yes" || "no" || "remove_bp" ?
But then another uprobe_register(same_addr) should handle this case
somehow. Just a crazy idea, unlikely it makes sense.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at