Re: [Patch 5/8] mqueue: revert bump up DFLT_*MAX

From: Serge E. Hallyn
Date: Wed Apr 18 2012 - 11:32:17 EST


Quoting Doug Ledford (dledford@xxxxxxxxxx):
> On 4/17/2012 11:22 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Doug Ledford (dledford@xxxxxxxxxx):
> >> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Mqueue limitation is slightly naieve parameter likes other ipcs
> >> because unprivileged user can consume kernel memory by using ipcs.
> >>
> >> Thus, too aggressive raise bring us security issue. Example,
> >> current setting allow evil unprivileged user use 256GB (= 256
> >> * 1024 * 1024*1024) and it's enough large to system will belome
> >> unresponsive. Don't do that.
> >>
> >> Instead, every admin should adjust the knobs for their own systems.
> >
> > Would you be terribly averse to having a higher limit in init_ipc_ns,
> > and the lower values by default in all child namespaces?
> >
> > Sorry it sounds from the intro like you've already had quite a bit of
> > discussion on this...
> >
> > Of course I realize the values can just be raised by distro boot
> > scripts...
>
> The default maximums this patch put into place were in fact in place
> from 2008 until my earlier patch in this same series, so in that regard
> this is merely restoring an already established default maximum. It

Then never mind :)

(My ack stands)

> *could* be raised, yes, but as Motohiro pointed out, this is pinned
> memory that any user can allocate, so the smaller the default amount the
> better. The sysadmin can make changes as they see fit.

Thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/