Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: avoid I2C abnormal after resuming from deep sleep

From: Li Yang
Date: Wed Apr 18 2012 - 10:44:15 EST

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>> We certainly don't want the policy to be against the common practice
>> of the community. ÂIf it is we can consider changing our policy.
> Nice, thanks for being open to discussion!
>> However I can't find a clear message stating the consensus of what the
>> Linux kernel community think of adding copyright claims. ÂI even found
> Well, what I know, the consensus is "common sense". What is obviously
> not "clear" in a way you could write it down. At least, Ben agrees.

We do honor your point and can be flexible on this. I'm just not sure
if our policy need to be changed to align with the common sense of the

>> some message that encourage adding copyright to maintain the GPL
>> license.
> I am interested. Do you have a link?

Well. I can't find the exact message. I remember it is from an email
discussion in which someone said by encouraging contributors to add
copyright claims to a file it would be clear that no one can change
the license of the file away from GPL.

- Leo
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at