Re: [ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review

From: Felipe Contreras
Date: Mon Apr 16 2012 - 16:11:08 EST

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just one minor correction in this looney email thread:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:53:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> v3.3.x on the other hand are *not* stable. They contain patches
>> backported from v3.4, but nobody guarantees they will work. There was
>> no v3.3.1-rc1, so the first time the patches compromising v3.3.1 were
>> generally tested together is in v3.3.1, at which point if somebody
>> finds issues, it's too late; bad patches are *not* going to be removed
>> in v3.3.2.
> Of course there was a 3.3.1-rc1, see the linux-kernel archives for the
> announcemen and the individual patches. Â has the large patch
> itself if you like that format instead.

I don't see it here:;a=tags

If you really want people to try it, why not tag it?

Felipe Contreras
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at