[PATCH 2/3] trace-cmd: don't call stop_threads() if doing latency tracing

From: Mark Asselstine
Date: Thu Apr 05 2012 - 15:19:32 EST


If we are using a latency tracer we do not call start_threads() we
should therefore not call stop_threads() if 'latency'. Attempting
to call stop_threads() without first calling start_threads() will
cause a segfault since pids will be uninitialized.

Signed-off-by: Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
trace-record.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/trace-record.c b/trace-record.c
index fcec28b..1c56fa9 100644
--- a/trace-record.c
+++ b/trace-record.c
@@ -2216,7 +2216,8 @@ void trace_record (int argc, char **argv)
}

disable_tracing();
- stop_threads();
+ if (!latency)
+ stop_threads();
}

for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu_count; cpu++) {
--
1.7.5.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/