RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] RFC: Prepare PAD for native and xenplatform

From: Liu, Jinsong
Date: Thu Apr 05 2012 - 09:01:57 EST


Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> Compare approaches:
>>>
>>> 1. xen overwritten approach (patches V2, x86_init, osl approach)
>>> Pros: a little simpler code
>>> Cons:
>>> 1). specific to xen, cannot extend to other virt platform;
>>> 2). need to change natvie acpi_pad as modular;
>>>
>>> 2. paravirt interface approach (original patches V1) Pros:
>>> 1). standard hypervisor-agnostic interface (USENIX
>>> conference 2006), can easily hook to Xen/lguest/... on
>>> demand; 2). arch independent; 3). no need to change native
>>> acpi_pad as non-modular; Cons: a little complicated
>>> code, and code patching is some
>>> overkilled for this case (but no harm);
>>>
>>> (BTW, in the future we need add more and more pv ops, like
>>> pv_pm_ops, pv_cpu_hotplug_ops, pv_mem_hotplug_ops, etc. So how
>>> about add a pv_misc_ops template to handle them all? seems it's a
>>> common issue).
>>>
>
> I think (and you probabaly have a better idea) is that the maintainer
> of drivers/acpi/* is not very open to adding in code that only
> benefits Xen.
>
> If it benefits other architectures (say ARM) then adding in hooks
> there (in osl for example) makes sense - but I am not sure if ARM has
> a form
> of _PUR code/calls it needs to do.
>
> So with that in mind, neither of those options seems proper - as all
> of them depend on changing something in drivers/acpi/*.
>
> I've one or two suggestions of what could be done to still make this
> work, but I need you to first see what happens if the native acpi_pad
> runs under Xen with the latest upstream code (along with three patches
> that are in a BZ I pointed you too).

Konrad, any new idea? seems we hardly totally walk around acpi staff. Thanks, Jinsong--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/