Re: [PATCH v5 06/27] irq_domain/powerpc: eliminate irq_map; useirq_alloc_desc() instead

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 23:52 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> If we want to fix it a better way, then sure, that'll be good.  But
> what
> we shouldn't do is re-introduce one regression to fix a different
> regression.
> 
> So, Thomas, what do you think about providing a way that a disabled
> interrupt could have its pending status cleared such that when it's
> enabled, any queued events are ignored?  Maybe an
> enable_and_clear_irq() ? 

Ok. Doesn't matter anyway, this shouldn't be the problem in this
specific case. IE. we shouldn't be setting that interrupt to NONE.

We should have parsed the device-tree and set the trigger appropriately.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/