Re: [RFC] AutoNUMA alpha6

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:52:42PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Your three numbers of mainline looked ok, it's still strange that
> numa01_same_node is identical to numa01_inverse_bind though. It
> shoudln't. same_node uses 1 numa node. inverse uses both nodes but

The only reasonable explanation I can imagine for the weird stuff
going on with "numa01_inverse" is that maybe it was compiled without
-DHARD_BIND? I forgot to specify -DINVERSE_BIND is a noop unless
-DHARD_BIND is specified too at the same time. -DINVERSE_BIND alone
results in the default build without -D parameters.

Now AutoNUMA has a bug and is real inverse bind too, I need to fix that.

In the meantime this is possible:

echo 0 >/sys/kernel/mm/autonuma/enabled
run numa01_inverse
echo 1 >/sys/kernel/mm/autonuma/enabled
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/