Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: phylib: remove the length limitation of miibus id

From: Dong Aisheng
Date: Wed Mar 21 2012 - 07:15:41 EST


On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:06:57PM +0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 03/20/12 11:53, Dong Aisheng a écrit :
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Shawn Guo<shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On 20 March 2012 12:23, Dong Aisheng<b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> From: Dong Aisheng<dong.aisheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> When convert to dt, the length of old mii bus id (17 bytes) is not
> >>> sufficent to use.
> >>> For example, the bus id could be 800f0000.ethernet-1:00 in DT.
> >>>
> >>> This patch removes the bus id length limitation by changing the
> >>> bus id to a const char pionter and user could dynamically set the
> >>> bus id via kasprintf function call.
> >>>
> >>> Since then no users use MII_BUS_ID_SIZE any more, just remove it.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng<dong.aisheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> The simplest way may just change MII_BUS_ID_SIZE to a more bigger size,
> >>> but i'm not sure that's gonna be accepted.
> >>
> >> The simplest fix has been applied on -next tree as below.
> >>
> > Oh, i missed it, seems my patch covers that change.
> > But that patch only fixed wrong phy_name buffer length issue.
> > My patch is totally remove the length limitation of bus id and phy_name
> > or the bus id name will be truncated if it's longer than MII_BUS_ID_SIZE
> > which is not a comfortable limitation.
>
> Then just increase the bus id size locally for your driver. Drivers that
> can live with a static allocation are better of using it.
>
That's the common part, can not change it locally by driver.
Or we can change MII_BUS_ID_SIZE to a more big size in common code,
maybe 30 bytes, but when is the end?

> Your patch completely missed testing the return value of kasprintf(),
> and its return value can be NULL, please fix this at least.
>
Yes, thanks for the reminder.
I will fix it.

Regards
Dong Aisheng

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/