Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: Move init fields from clk to clk_hw

From: Paul Walmsley
Date: Tue Mar 20 2012 - 19:47:42 EST


Hello Sascha

On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:

> [ C99 structure initializer elided ]
>
> This will make a 4000 line file out of a 500 line file. Now when for
> some reason struct clk_divider changes we end with big patches. If the
> clk core gets a new fancy CLK_ flag which we want to have then again
> we end up with big patches. Then there's also the possibility that
> someone finds out that .lock and .hw.flags are common to all dividers
> and comes up with a #define DEFINE_CLK_DIVIDER again to share common
> fields.

At least we can understand easily what is being changed. Readability,
particularly by others not familiar with the clock data, is more important
to me.

So like Saravana, I too prefer C99 structure initializers. At least there
should be a choice.

Quick quiz: in this line below:

imx_clk_divider("foo_clk", "bar_clk", CCM_BASE + 0x20, 0x5, 0x3);

which field is the bitfield shift and which is the bitfield width? :-)


- Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/