Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/telephony/ixj.c::add_caps(): don't rely onundefined behaviour

From: Joe Perches
Date: Mon Mar 19 2012 - 19:29:43 EST


On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 00:19 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 23:46 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 23:37 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > > In drivers/telephony/ixj.c::add_caps() we have several statements like this:
> > > > > j->caplist[j->caps].handle = j->caps++;
> > > > > That's undefined behaviour right there.
> > > > telephony has been moved to staging.
> > > Since when? Where?
> > > In my up-to-date Linus tree with HEAD at
> > > c16fa4f2ad19908a47c63d8fa436a1178438c7e7, that file is is still in
> > > drivers/telephony/, not in staging/...
> > > /confused
> > In the -next tree.
> Ok, seems I've missed that.
> > Yes, it's a bug fix, but drivers/telephony is pretty dead.
> Dead or not, as long as it's in the tree I think that fixing bugs is
> relevant.
> Besides, who knows if/when it'll get ressurrected ;)

Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest it shouldn't
be fixed.

I meant that it probably didn't need to be
fixed during the merge window or maybe even
not backported to stable unless you're sure
the order of operations is now done correctly
and with no real change in current operation
by inspecting the object. I presume it worked
before but it's likely not too many people
actually still use this hardware with the
current kernel.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/