Re: [ 57/72] genirq: Unmask oneshot irqs when thread was not woken

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > Thomas, should we just plan on reverting that commit from mainline? It
> > clearly causes regressions.
> 
> Give me a day or two to figure out why it breaks stuff. I have no idea
> why it should wreckage anything.

Hmm. This is interesting. The b43 driver has a primary handler which
can return IRQ_NONE. So up to that change the interrupt line was kept
disabled when that happened. Possibly the driver relies on that
behaviour. Digging for a machine with a b43.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/