[ 07/34] printk_ratelimited(): fix uninitialized spinlock

[Greg KH]

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit d8521fcc5e0ad3e79bbc4231bb20a6cdc2b50164 upstream.

ratelimit_state initialization of printk_ratelimited() seems broken.  This
fixes it by using DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE() to initialize spinlock
properly.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 include/linux/kernel.h |   15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -411,14 +411,13 @@ static inline char *pack_hex_byte(char *
  * no local ratelimit_state used in the !PRINTK case
  */
 #ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
-#define printk_ratelimited(fmt, ...)  ({		\
-	static struct ratelimit_state _rs = {		\
-		.interval = DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, \
-		.burst = DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST,       \
-	};                                              \
-							\
-	if (__ratelimit(&_rs))                          \
-		printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);		\
+#define printk_ratelimited(fmt, ...)  ({				\
+	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(_rs,				\
+				      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,	\
+				      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);		\
+									\
+	if (__ratelimit(&_rs))						\
+		printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);				\
 })
 #else
 /* No effect, but we still get type checking even in the !PRINTK case: */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/