Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/rcu: Add _rcuidle() tracepoint tohandle rcu_idle_exit() tracepoints

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 19:09 +0100, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have some problem with cpuidle tracing:
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42742
> 
> so I applied 3 patches from https://lkml.org/lkml/headers/2012/2/7/231
> 
> > Steven Rostedt (3):
> >      tracing/rcu: Add trace_##name##__rcuidle() static tracepoint for inside rcu_idle_exit() sections
> >      x86/tracing: Denote the power and cpuidle tracepoints as _rcuidle()
> >      cpuidle/tracing: Denote the tracepoints as being in rcu_idle_exit() section
> 
> All 3 patches applied cleanly but for unknown reasons to me compilation fails:

Yeah, my testing hit this issue and I fixed it up. I pushed out my
patches to Ingo that have passed all my tests. You can get them here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/13/528

You only need to apply patches 3,4 and 5.

-- Steve

> 
> CC      arch/x86/kernel/process.o
>   arch/x86/kernel/process.c: In function âdefault_idleâ:
>   arch/x86/kernel/process.c:380:3: error: implicit declaration of function âtrace_power_start_rcuidleâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   arch/x86/kernel/process.c:394:3: error: implicit declaration of function âtrace_power_end_rcuidleâ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/