Re: [PATCH 1/4] signal: give SEND_SIG_FORCED more power to beatSIGNAL_UNKILLABLE

[Tejun Heo]

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 06:45:28PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > How about the following indentation instead?  :)
> >
> > 	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t,
> > 	    from_ancestor_ns || (info == SEND_SIG_FORCED)))
> 
> Well, I am not sure this looks better, although I do not really mind.
> But since this patch is already in -mm, I think I won't send v2 ;)

Yeah, they are different but equally ugly, I suppose. :)

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/