Re: [PATCH 20/40] mn10300: Use set_current_blocked() andblock_sigmask()

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 02/14, David Howells wrote:
>
> Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >  asmlinkage long sys_sigsuspend(int history0, int history1, old_sigset_t mask)
> >  {
> > -	mask &= _BLOCKABLE;
> > -	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> > +	sigset_t blocked;
> > +
> >  	current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;
>
> Can this line create a race, now that it's not protected by a lock?  It is
> possible for current->blocked to get altered by another thread.

No, only current can change ->blocked. This is even documented in
sigprocmask(). And more, the only correct way to change ->blocked
is set_current_blocked(). OK, with a couple of "I know what I am
doing" exceptions in kernel/signal.c.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/