Re: [GIT PULL 00/16] perf/core improvements and fixes

[David Ahern]

On 2/13/12 10:10 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
>
> It happened because I used old kernel version that isn't aware of the
> exclude_guest bit. So the check on attr->__reserved_1 in
> core.c::perf_copy_attr() failed and then ended up seeing EINVAL at
> perf_evsel__open().

comes back to 1aed2671738785e8f5aea663a6fda91aa7ef59b5 again. See

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/8/234

> So I think it should be handled in the same way of handling
> sample_id_all bit in perf record and top if we want to set perf_guest to
> false by default. I'll send patches for them soon.
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/